Skip to main content



After Havis, an Offer to Sell is not a “Controlled Substance Offense”

Does the Texas offense of possession with intent to distribute qualify as a “controlled substance offense” under the guidelines? In United States v. Serrano, the Sixth Circuit held that it does not.

Serrano was convicted under a statute that prohibited manufacturing, delivering, or possessing with intent to deliver a controlled substance.  Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.112 (2004) (amended 2009).  Under Texas case law, these are all means of committing the same crime, so the statute is not divisible.  Texas law also includes offering to sell a controlled substance in its definition of “deliver.” 

Serrano argued that his prior conviction was not categorically a “controlled substance offense” because that term does not include offers to sell.

The Sixth Circuit had previously disagreed.  In United States v. Evans, 699 F.3d 858, 868 (6th Cir. 2012), the Court had held that an offer to sell was an attempt to transfer a controlled substance.  And because the commentary to the guideline…

Latest Posts

What Constitutes a "Covered Sex Crime" under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.5(b)?

United States v. Tolliver: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Payment for Drugs Constitutes "Promotional Money Laundering."

Richardson Revisited...Again.

Can a family member sign a 2255 petition on behalf of a defendant?

Bait and Search

“Blatantly inappropriate” prosecutor conduct, but no remedy

Can a conviction involve a non-existent child and still be a crime "involving a minor"?

Safety-Valve Application: Sixth Circuit Joins Seven Other Circuits

The Right to Self-Representation Includes Conspiracy Theorists, Even to Their Detriment

The Not So Saving Clause: Court Tightens Relief Available for Second Habeas Petitions