Tuesday, January 26, 2016
You can't penalize a defendant at sentencing for refusing to present evidence in support of a claim
We have all been there before - a client contends that the police are lying, they are not providing all of the evidence, or, even more significantly, have doctored the evidence. So what happens? You investigate, find out whether there is any truth to the allegations, and act (or not act) accordingly. But every once in awhile, the client moves forward without you. And that is when the trouble can really start.
In United States v. Cabrera, the defendant was convinced that police had altered an audio tape of an undercover buy. After trial, the defendant, acting pro-se, suggested that not only was the tape altered, but that the police officers were corrupt, and that he had been forced to participate in the crime at gunpoint. At sentencing, the court imposed the high end of the Guidelines range, based in part on the allegations (which the court determined were attempts to "game" the system), and the defendant's failure to present evidence in support of the allegations.
The Sixth Circuit determined that the court's reliance on both of these factors was reversible error, even under a plain error standard of review. The Court first determined that by punishing Cabrera for failing to put on evidence (such as his own testimony) on the issue of the tape alterations, it was punishing Cabrera for exercising his Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination.
Next, the Court determined that the Sixth Amendment was also violated when Cabrera was punished for raising a "fantastic" claim. "By relying on this factor, the district judge violated Cabrera’s Sixth Amendment right to oppose the government’s case against him." Such conduct fell outside the purview of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A). The Court therefore remanded for resentencing.