In case you
missed it in the excitement over the Supreme Court declaring Johnson
retroactive less than three weeks after hearing argument on the issue, the Sixth Circuit today continued its
recent trend of publishing decisions rejecting motions under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582 for relief under Guideline Amendment 782, aka “drugs minus two.” Fortunately, there are still plenty of ways for defendants to "shoot the gap" and gain relief.
First, in February, the court in United
States v. Smith, No. 15-5853, held that a defendant is ineligible for
relief if Amendment 782 wouldn't have affected the original guideline range because the defendant was a career offender. This ruling doesn't apply, however, even to career offenders, if the defendant’s guideline range based on
the drug guideline was higher than the range based on the career-offender
guideline.
Next, in
March, the court in United
States v. Taylor, No. 15-5930, concluded (over Judge Merritt’s dissent) that § 3582 relief is unavailable for drug offenders who received a
downward variance based on a mix of
substantial assistance and other “non-assistance factors.” Offenders who
received a downward variance based solely on assistance remain eligible for
relief. See USSG
§ 1B1.10(b).
Then today,
in United States
v. McNeese, No. 15-5548, the court decided that a defendant who pleads guilty
according to a Rule 11(c) plea agreement is not eligible for relief under
§ 3582 if the agreement itself does not explicitly mention a guideline range.
Section 3582(c)(2) requires, for a sentencing reduction, that the sentence be “based
on” a sentencing range that was subsequently lowered by the Sentencing
Commission. Relying on United States v. Freeman, the court concluded that, even
if by the time of sentencing it was clear the sentence was derived from a guidelines
range, the range must be clear from the agreement itself in order to qualify
for relief. McNeese is fairly easy to distinguish:
As long as a Rule 11(c) plea agreement explicitly incorporates a guideline range, McNeese shouldn’t bar relief.
No comments:
Post a Comment