In a
recently published opinion, the Sixth Circuit held that delivery of a
controlled substance under Tenn. Code. § 39-17-417(a) is a “serious drug
offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act. The Court rejected the defendant’s argument
that the term “deliver” under Tennessee law is broader than term “distribute”
under the ACCA.
Under the ACCA, the term “distribute”
means to deliver, other than by administering or dispensing, a controlled
substance. Likewise, under Tennessee
law, “distribute” means to deliver, other than by administering or dispensing,
a controlled substance. However, Tennessee
law prohibits “delivery” while the ACCA includes convictions for “distribution.”
Accordingly, Mr. Goldston argued that
delivery is broader than distribution, because the definition for distribution excludes
delivery by administering or dispensing.
In other words, delivery necessarily includes delivery by administration
or dispensation, while distribution excludes those two types of delivery.
Although the Sixth Circuit
acknowledged that “at first glance there might appear to be merit” to this
argument, the Court ultimately rejected it.
The Court held that Tennessee did not actually criminalize either administering
or dispensing controlled substances, because the definitions of these terms
necessarily included only legal deliveries.
Thus, delivery includes only one category of prohibited conduct, which
is distribution.
Opinion
available here.
No comments:
Post a Comment